Kubernetes Backup: 4 Components to Backup and 5 Backup Strategies

Kubernetes makes apps easy to run day-to-day, but hard to back up and recover when something goes wrong.
Share post:

What Is Kubernetes Backup? 

Kubernetes backup involves protecting the critical components and data within a Kubernetes cluster to ensure business continuity and disaster recovery. This includes both the cluster’s state and the application data running within it.

Key components to back up include:

  • etcd database: This is the core of the Kubernetes control plane, storing all cluster data, including configurations, status, and metadata. Regular backups of etcd are crucial for restoring the cluster’s state. 
  • Persistent Volumes (PVs): These store the actual application data. Backing up PVs ensures the data used by your applications can be recovered.
  •  Kubernetes resources: This includes application configurations (like Deployments, Services, ConfigMaps, Secrets), namespaces, and other cluster-level resources.

Backup strategies include:

  • Application-aware backups: Focus on backing up specific applications, including their persistent data and associated Kubernetes resources. This allows for granular recovery of individual applications. 
  • Cluster-level backups: Capture the entire state of the cluster, including etcd, persistent volumes, and all Kubernetes resources. This is essential for full disaster recovery scenarios. 
  • Scheduled backups: Implement automated schedules for backups, with frequency tailored to the criticality of the data (e.g., daily etcd backups, weekly full cluster backups). 
  • Offsite/cloud backups: Store backups in a separate location, either offsite or in a cloud storage solution like AWS S3 or Azure Blob—ideally with immutability and air-gapped security. 

✅ TIP: N2W supports cross-cloud backup and immutable storage out of the box, so your data stays tamper-proof and always in your control

This is part of a series of articles about Kubernetes security

In this article:

What Makes Backing Up Kubernetes Different from VMs or Monoliths? 

Kubernetes environments are composed of loosely coupled, distributed components that change frequently. Workloads are declarative and ephemeral, meaning containers may be rescheduled at any time and their state rebuilt from manifests. This requires backups that capture not only data but also the dynamic configuration and relationships between objects, something traditional VM‑centric backups are not designed for.

Unlike monolithic systems, Kubernetes relies on external storage providers, controllers, and APIs that must be backed up in a coordinated, application‑aware manner. Ensuring consistency across etcd, persistent volumes, and resource definitions demands tooling that understands Kubernetes’ control plane and storage semantics rather than treating workloads as static machines.

Why Kubernetes Backup Matters 

There are several reasons to back up information in Kubernetes environments:

  • Data protection and resilience in distributed systems: Kubernetes clusters run distributed workloads across nodes, managing both stateless and stateful applications. Without proper backup, a hardware or software failure can cause substantial data loss and prolonged outages. A backup solution ensures that persistent application data, configuration, and system state are all restorable after partial or complete infrastructure failures.
  • Preventing configuration drift and accidental deletions: Kubernetes environments are highly dynamic, with frequent changes to configuration, deployments, or resources initiated either automatically or by operators. This flexibility increases the risk of configuration drift. Backups enable point-in-time capture of system state, which can be leveraged to restore stability in the event that unintended changes or manual errors disrupt operations.
  • Defense against ransomware and insider threats: Kubernetes workloads, especially those with persistent storage, can become targets for attackers who encrypt or exfiltrate data. Backing up both the data and the cluster state on an immutable, offsite location creates a line of defense, enabling restoration of clean, uncompromised copies even if live data gets encrypted or destroyed.
  • Meeting compliance and retention policies:  Many industries require strict adherence to regulatory frameworks that mandate data retention, backup, and recoverability. Organizations running workloads on Kubernetes are no exception and must be able to demonstrate that production environments and sensitive data are backed up according to compliance standards. 

Key Kubernetes Components to Back Up

1. Backing Up etcd Database

Etcd is the key-value store at the core of the Kubernetes control plane, housing all cluster state, configuration, and metadata. If the etcd datastore is corrupted or lost, the cluster itself can become unrecoverable. Backing up etcd regularly is fundamental; this should include approaches that support version compatibility and consistent snapshots, especially for highly available clusters spread across zones or regions.

Securing these backups is also vital, as etcd can contain sensitive configuration data, secrets, and access information. Regular backup scheduling, encryption, and storing backups in offsite or immutable storage reduce the risks of data corruption, tampering, and unauthorized access. Restoration testing ensures that these backups are usable and that the cluster can be recreated or rolled back reliably in real-world scenarios.

✅ TIP: With N2W, you can automate and schedule Kubernetes backups for Amazon EKS—complete with easy recovery into the same cluster or a new one.

2. Backing Up Persistent Volumes (PVs) and Persistent Volume Claims (PVCs)

Kubernetes enables stateful workloads through persistent volumes (PVs) and persistent volume claims (PVCs). PVs abstract the underlying storage, while PVCs grant pods access to storage resources for databases, file uploads, or other stateful data. Backing up PVs ensures that application-level data is protected, regardless of changes to or redeployments of workloads.

Depending on the backing storage technology (block storage, file shares, object stores), the approach to backing up PVs will differ. Tools must coordinate with storage providers to create application-consistent snapshots or offload data safely. In all cases, mapping PVCs to restored PVs during recovery is crucial for application continuity, as mismatches can prevent workloads from regaining access to persistent storage.

3. Backing Up Cluster Configuration

Cluster configuration encompasses elements such as authentication setup, admission controllers, network policies, and scheduler settings. These components govern access controls, workload placement, and the security model of a Kubernetes environment. Losing such configuration can cause service outages, security vulnerabilities, or loss of governance.

Automating the export and versioning of cluster configuration, either via export tools or infrastructure as code workflows, ensures these details are captured in backups. Restoring this configuration is as important as data recovery, especially after an incident in which the control plane or etcd is rebuilt from scratch.

4. Backing Up Kubernetes Resources

Backing up Kubernetes resources ensures that the metadata, configuration, and operational definitions of workloads can be restored alongside application data. Resources such as deployments, services, and custom objects must be captured to maintain dependencies, networking behavior, and scaling logic during recovery. Exporting these manifests or using tools that automatically collect them is essential for recreating the environment correctly.

ConfigMaps

Back up ConfigMaps by exporting them as YAML or using backup tools that snapshot resource definitions, ensuring configuration settings can be reapplied after restoration.

Secrets

Securely back up Secrets in encrypted form, either through Kubernetes APIs or external secret stores, since they often contain credentials or sensitive data required for application access.

Deployments

Include Deployment manifests in backups so replica settings, container specs, and update strategies can be restored consistently across clusters or namespaces.

Services

Back up Service objects to preserve networking behavior, cluster IP assignments, and routing rules used by applications.

CRDs (Custom Resource Definitions)

Export CRDs and their custom resource instances to maintain platform extensions and ensure controllers can rebuild their expected state during recovery.

Tips from the Expert
Picture of Catalin Voicu
Catalin Voicu
Catalin is a seasoned Systems Engineer at N2W with extensive experience spanning cloud technologies and enterprise IT. He bridges the gap between complex infrastructure challenges and practical, customer-focused solutions. With a deep understanding of AWS and the full spectrum of IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS, he brings clarity to the cloud—sometimes with a dash of Romanian trivia to keep things interesting.

Kubernetes Backup Strategies 

1. Application-Centric vs. Cluster-Wide Backups

Application-centric backup strategies focus on protecting individual workloads by backing up their persistent data, resource manifests, and dependencies. These strategies enable rapid granular restores for specific applications or namespaces, minimizing downtime for isolated incidents. Application-centric backups are particularly useful for multi-tenant clusters or environments with varying workload criticalities, where not all resources require the same level of protection.

Cluster-wide backups capture the entire state of the Kubernetes environment, including all namespaces, cluster settings, and system resources. This approach is suitable for disaster recovery scenarios, such as restoring a whole cluster after a catastrophic failure or migrating workloads to a new environment. While cluster-wide backups take more storage and can be slower to restore, they provide maximum coverage and minimize the risk of missing dependencies during recovery.

2. Snapshot-Based Backups

Snapshot-based backups create point-in-time copies of data volumes or etcd using underlying storage or cloud platform features. Snapshots are a fast and storage-efficient method, as they typically capture only changed blocks and can be triggered automatically with minimal impact on production workloads. Cloud providers and major storage systems often offer integrated snapshot capabilities that Kubernetes backup tools can leverage.

One limitation of snapshots is ensuring application consistency. If an application writes data during a snapshot, recovery may result in a corrupt or inconsistent state. To address this, snapshot workflows should be coordinated with workload quiescing or designed to work with application-aware hooks. Combining snapshots with traditional resource export offers greater reliability for stateful and mission-critical applications.

3. Incremental and Differential Backups

Incremental backups only store data that has changed since the last backup, while differential backups track changes since a baseline full backup. Both approaches reduce storage needs and speed up backup processes by avoiding redundant copies of unchanged data. In Kubernetes, incremental or differential backups can apply to both persistent volumes and exported resource objects, optimizing backup cycles for large or frequently changing clusters.

Implementing incremental backups involves maintaining clear chains of reference and ensuring that restores can reliably reconstruct the desired state. Management complexity increases as backup sets grow, necessitating automation and integrity checks to avoid gaps in coverage. Regular validation and periodic full backups complement incremental or differential schedules, providing a fallback if a backup in the chain becomes corrupt or unavailable.

4. Cloud-Native and Hybrid Backup Approaches

Cloud-native Kubernetes backup solutions integrate directly with managed services and infrastructure APIs, automating resource discovery, backup, and restore across diverse environments. These tools natively support multi-region, cross-cluster, or multi-cloud deployments, providing flexibility as clusters scale or migrate. Cloud-native options often offer features like policy-based automation, global monitoring, and integrated encryption.

Hybrid backup solutions span multiple locations or combine on-premises infrastructure with public clouds. They must support heterogeneous storage types, networking, and security models. Integrating hybrid strategies requires unified management tools and standardized backup formats to ensure consistent protection and seamless recovery regardless of where data or workloads reside.

✅ TIP: N2W is purpose-built for hybrid cloud backup across AWS, Azure, and Wasabi—all managed from one console.

5. GitOps-Based Configuration Backups

GitOps strategies treat declarative resource manifests as source code, maintained in a version-controlled repository such as Git. Configuration backups, in this model, happen automatically as updates and changes are committed, creating an auditable, visible, and historical record. Recovery involves syncing cluster state from the Git repository, streamlining restoration while reducing configuration drift risks.

By leveraging infrastructure as code along with automation tools (such as Flux or ArgoCD), GitOps-based backup workflows facilitate both version control and rapid redeployment of workloads and platform settings. This approach aligns backup, security, and deployment workflows, increasing both reliability and traceability in Kubernetes operations.

Common Challenges in Kubernetes Backup

Complexity of Dynamic Environments

Kubernetes environments are designed for agility and rapid scaling, resulting in frequent changes to workload placement, resource allocation, and system topology. This dynamic nature introduces challenges for backup strategies, especially in tracking which resources, states, and data need to be protected at any given time. Traditional backup tools can struggle to keep up with these continual shifts, leading to gaps or incomplete coverage.

Container orchestrators abstract infrastructure, making it harder to directly capture underlying dependencies and configurations. Automated discovery, integration with native APIs, and event-driven triggers are necessary for ensuring that backups reflect the current, live state of the environment. Addressing this complexity is fundamental to achieving reliable recovery and minimizing operational blind spots.

How cloud-native backup can help:

  • Automatically discover resources and topology changes through native API integration.
  • Trigger backups based on events rather than fixed schedules.
  • Capture application-aware snapshots that reflect current live state.

Stateful vs. Stateless Application Handling

Stateless workloads in Kubernetes can be redeployed or scaled out without persistent data, simplifying their backup and restore needs. In contrast, stateful applications rely on consistent volumes and data, and any restoration workflow must ensure that such information is captured and mapped correctly at restore time. Reconciling these two types of workloads within a cohesive backup strategy requires nuanced tooling and careful identification of which resources are critical to each application’s integrity.

Backing up only persistent volumes for stateful workloads is insufficient—related Kubernetes objects (like StatefulSets, configmaps, or secrets) must also be protected. Failing to account for these associations can lead to partial or failed recoveries, breaking applications in subtle ways that are hard to debug. Fine-grained and application-aware backup plans address these challenges by considering end-to-end state dependencies.

How cloud-native backup can help:

  • Identify application components and link persistent volumes with their Kubernetes objects.
  • Provide workload‑aware hooks for quiescing or coordinating stateful backups.
  • Restore stateful applications with correct PVC mapping and dependency ordering.

Managing Large-Scale Storage and Network I/O

Production-grade Kubernetes clusters host high volumes of data and may span dozens or hundreds of nodes, magnifying the complexity of backup operations. Moving and storing backup data in such environments puts pressure on storage systems, network throughput, and backup windows. Efficiently orchestrating large backups without impacting cluster performance requires parallelization, throttling, and incremental copy techniques.

I/O bottlenecks, storage contention, and network failures can all delay or disrupt backup jobs. To mitigate these risks, backup workflows should incorporate error handling, intelligent retry logic, and robust monitoring. Leveraging cloud storage, object stores, or distributed filesystems can further ease I/O constraints, but these must be balanced with cost and data security considerations.

How cloud-native backup can help:

  • Use incremental or differential copies to reduce network and storage load.
  • Parallelize backup operations across nodes to shorten backup windows.
  • Leverage object storage or cloud-native backends optimized for large throughput.

Version Compatibility and API Deprecations

Kubernetes evolves quickly, introducing new resource APIs, altering object schemas, and deprecating legacy features. These changes can break backup and restore workflows, especially if backup solutions do not keep pace with upstream releases. Restoring backups made on an older Kubernetes version to a newer cluster may fail due to missing or changed APIs, resulting in incomplete or inconsistent recovery.

Maintaining version compatibility requires aligning backup tooling, resource exports, and validation routines with the evolving cluster landscape. Automated checks, regular upgrade testing, and adherence to Kubernetes’ versioning guidelines all help minimize restore failures and compatibility surprises following platform upgrades or migrations.

How cloud-native backup can help:

  • Track Kubernetes API versions and adjust backup logic automatically.
  • Validate backups against target cluster versions before restoration.
  • Maintain schema-aware exports that adapt to API evolution.

Kubernetes Backup Best Practices 

1. Embrace Infrastructure as Code and Declarative Management

Treat all cluster resources—deployments, configurations, policies, and storage—as code by capturing them in declarative manifests, then storing those in version control. This makes rollback, disaster recovery, and migration more reliable, since the entire environment can be reproduced or restored from code. Using infrastructure as code with tools like Helm, Kustomize, or Terraform also enforces consistency across development, staging, and production clusters.

Declarative management not only aids backup processes but reduces human error and enhances documentation, as changes to infrastructure pass through peer review and auditable commit history. This discipline helps ensure that recovery operations recreate the intended cluster state rather than guesswork.

2. Automate and Regularly Validate Backups

Manual backup workflows quickly fall out of sync with a dynamic Kubernetes environment, leading to missed resources, outdated snapshots, or gaps in coverage. Automating backup jobs through scheduling tools, Kubernetes-native controllers, or external platforms ensures consistency and reliability. Automation can also identify changes since the last backup, further refining storage and time efficiency.

Validation is as important as taking the backup itself. Periodically test backup and restore workflows in production-like environments to catch issues with resource coverage, version compatibility, or data corruption. Regular drill exercises—automated or manual—ensure that recovery runs as expected and prepare teams for incident response.

✅ TIP: With N2W, automated DR drills let you validate restores and receive email notifications that everything is working as expected.

3. Ensure Encryption and Secure Access to Backup Data

Backup files often contain sensitive data—application secrets, user credentials, and system configurations. Securing backup data at rest (using storage-layer or application-layer encryption) and in transit (using TLS or secure channels) is non-negotiable. Apply fine-grained access controls so that only authorized users or automated systems can retrieve and restore backup data.

Securing the backup infrastructure is as important as the primary environment. Monitor for unauthorized access, rotate credentials regularly, and store encryption keys separately from backup payloads. Implement immutable storage or write-once policies where possible, adding another layer of defense against tampering, accidental deletion, or ransomware.

4. Maintain Version Consistency Between Clusters and Tools

Frequent updates to Kubernetes and its ecosystem require close monitoring of version mismatches between clusters, backup tools, plugins, and CRDs. Backward or forward incompatibilities can lead to failed backups, incomplete restores, or unsupported resource types. Establish a policy to track compatible versions, test upgrades in staging, and proactively align all components across environments.

Automate version checks where possible, and subscribe to release notes or community updates from backup tool vendors. Consistent version management should include rolling upgrades or scheduled maintenance windows for both clusters and backup tooling, minimizing disruptions and keeping environments and their protections current.

5. Establish a Clear Retention and Rotation Policy

Define and document how many backup copies are kept, for how long, and under what conditions data is purged, archived, or rotated. These policies balance storage cost, legal retention requirements, and operational needs for rapid recovery. A good policy accounts for daily, weekly, and monthly cycles, maintaining short- and long-term restore capabilities.

Enforce retention policies through automated pruning, archiving to lower-cost storage, and audit logging. This reduces the risk of running out of capacity or violating data retention requirements, ensuring compliant and manageable growth of backup data over time.

6. Test Disaster Recovery in Production-Like Environments

Testing restores exclusively in development or isolated test clusters often fails to reveal real-world issues such as network policies, secrets management, or storage configuration mismatches. Simulate disaster recovery in environments as close to production as possible, using representative data sizes and workloads. This uncovers gaps in backup coverage, permission issues, and performance bottlenecks before an actual incident occurs.

Schedule these tests regularly, integrating them into CI/CD pipelines or IT operations playbooks. Document results and integrate lessons learned into both technical and organizational processes, cultivating preparedness and confidence in the backup and disaster recovery plan.

Kubernetes Backup with N2W

Protecting your EKS clusters doesn’t need to be a separate project. N2W now offers one-click, policy-driven backup and recovery for Amazon EKS—fully integrated into the same console you already use to protect EC2, RDS, S3, and more. 

No new tools. No Kubernetes complexity. Just ridiculously easy backup.

  • Instantly protect EKS namespaces, persistent volumes, and full clusters—automatically.
  • Restore to the same cluster or migrate to a new one with just a few clicks.
  • Roll back fast from misconfigurations or disasters—no YAML sorcery required.
  • Manage Kubernetes backups and AWS resources in a single, unified dashboard.

✅ One policy. One console. All your cloud workloads covered.

Ready to back up Kubernetes the easy way?

Start your 30-day trial now and see how fast disaster recovery can be.

You might also like